• Law -> Civil and Commercial Law

• 0 Comment

How do parties select the neutral third party who will preside over the alternative dispute resolution process?

Alisa Ruggieri

Hey friend,

When it comes to selecting a neutral third party to preside over an alternative dispute resolution process, there are several key factors that parties typically consider. These can include the qualifications and experience of potential neutrals, the specific needs and goals of the parties involved, and the overall reputation and track record of the individual or organization offering dispute resolution services.

One of the first steps in selecting a neutral third party is to identify potential candidates who have the necessary experience and expertise in the relevant field. For example, if the dispute at hand involves a complex legal issue, parties may look for an arbitrator or mediator who has a strong background in law and a track record of successful dispute resolution. Alternatively, if the dispute is between two companies in a specific industry, parties may look for a neutral with experience in that industry who can provide insight into the unique challenges and considerations involved.

Another key factor in selecting a neutral is the specific needs and goals of the parties involved. For example, if parties are seeking a quick resolution to a dispute, they may look for a neutral who has a reputation for facilitating efficient and streamlined proceedings. On the other hand, if parties are seeking a more collaborative, long-term solution, they may look for a neutral who is skilled at fostering open communication and finding creative solutions that can benefit all parties involved.

In addition to these factors, the reputation and track record of the neutral or organization offering dispute resolution services can also play a role in the selection process. Parties will typically look for neutrals who are respected and trusted within their field, with a track record of fair and effective dispute resolution. They may also consider factors such as the availability, cost, and convenience of the dispute resolution services being offered.

Overall, selecting a neutral third party for alternative dispute resolution requires careful consideration and evaluation of several key factors. By identifying potential candidates based on their qualifications and experience, considering the specific needs and goals of the parties involved, and evaluating the reputation and track record of potential neutrals, parties can increase their chances of finding a neutral who can help them reach a fair and effective resolution to their dispute.