• Law -> Intellectual Property and Copyright

• 0 Comment

Is it possible for a brand identity to become so generic that it loses its legal protection under intellectual property and copyright law?

Lovina Le

Yes, it is possible for a brand identity to become so generic that it loses its legal protection under intellectual property and copyright law. This phenomenon is known as genericism, and it occurs when a brand becomes so widely used that it is no longer associated with a particular source or origin. When this happens, the mark or brand name may no longer be eligible for trademark protection because it is considered a common or generic term that anyone can use.

The risk of genericism is particularly high for brands that have become synonymous with a product or service. For example, the brand name Kleenex has become so closely associated with facial tissues that it is often used as a generic term for tissue paper. Similarly, the brand name Xerox has become synonymous with photocopy machines. When a brand becomes so closely tied to a product or service, it becomes vulnerable to genericism because consumers may start using the brand name to refer to the entire category of products.

To prevent their brands from becoming generic, companies must take proactive steps to protect their intellectual property rights. One of the most effective strategies for avoiding genericism is to promote the brand name as a distinctive identifier of the company's products or services. This can be done through targeted advertising campaigns, product packaging, and promotional materials that emphasize the brand name and logo.

Another strategy is to actively police the use of the brand name by others. Companies should monitor the marketplace for unauthorized uses of their brand name or variations of it. If the company identifies instances of genericism, they should take swift action to assert their trademark rights. This may include sending cease and desist letters, taking legal action against infringers, or launching a public relations campaign to reinforce the primary message of the brand.

In conclusion, genericism represents a significant risk to brands that have become closely associated with a product or service. Companies must take proactive measures to protect their brand names and maintain their legal protection under intellectual property and copyright law. By promoting the brand name as a distinctive identifier and actively policing unauthorized uses, companies can avoid the pitfalls of genericism and preserve their valuable intellectual property rights.