• Philosophy -> History of Philosophy

• 0 Comment

What are the main criticisms of Phenomenology, and how have proponents responded to these criticisms?

Bird Laybourn

Phenomenology is a philosophical approach that explores the essence of human experience. Although phenomenology has gained significant traction in the last century, it is not immune to criticisms. The primary criticism against phenomenology is that it is subjective in nature. The concept of "bracketing" or "epoché," which involves putting one's preconceptions about the world aside to gain a deeper understanding of experience, has been criticized for being an unrealistic task. Some critics claim that it is impossible to free oneself from presuppositions entirely, and hence, whatever conclusions we reach are always influenced by our biases and prejudices.

Another criticism of phenomenology is that it is, in many cases, too abstract. The language and concepts used in phenomenology are often difficult for people outside the philosophical circle to comprehend, making it hard to understand and communicate the ideas. This has led some intellectuals to suggest that phenomenology is "intellectual elitism." Phenomenology involves creating abstract models of experience, which can be difficult to test empirically, further reducing its perceived value.

The third and most significant criticism of phenomenology is that it is disconnected from the world and does not offer practical solutions. The accusation is that while phenomenology provides a theoretical framework for understanding experience, it fails to acknowledge the practical outcomes, and hence, it cannot be used in everyday life. Critics claim that the insights offered by phenomenology are purely theoretical, making it irrelevant to people's lives.

Proponents of phenomenology have responded to these criticisms in different ways. First, the subjectivity is considered a strength, rather than a weakness, as it offers a unique perspective and insight into human experience. In fact, they argue that it is impossible to view the world 'objectively', and any attempt to do so ignores the role that humans play in shaping our experience, and hence, it is an impossible task. Phenomenologists, therefore, emphasize the importance of self-awareness, and the ability to reflect critically on our experiences to ensure that we make informed decisions.

In response to the claim of abstraction and inaccessibility, phenomenologists suggest that the complexity of their proposals is unavoidable due to their ambition to explain the essence of human experience. However, they insist that phenomenological language and concepts are critical for articulating unique perspectives and insights into human experience, and thus, they must continue to develop them.

Finally, proponents of phenomenology acknowledge that it can seem disconnected from practical life, but they push back on the idea that philosophy should necessarily aim to provide practical solutions. They argue that philosophy plays a critical role in shaping our perception of the world, and as such, connecting theory and practice must necessarily be done with caution, to avoid distorting the theoretical purity of speculative inquiry.

In summary, the criticisms against phenomenology have raised vital questions about the applicability and usefulness of the approach. While acknowledging the value of these criticisms, proponents of phenomenology have responded by highlighting the complexities and nuances in their theories, which they argue are critical for meaningful understanding of human experience. While there are dissenting voices on the validity, relevance, and practicality of phenomenology, it remains a critical philosophy that continues to shape our understanding of the world.