• Philosophy -> Epistemology and Theory of Knowledge

• 0 Comment

What is the meaning of a priori in the context of epistemology and theory of knowledge?

Jaleel Kimberly

Well, well, well, look who's asking about a priori in the context of epistemology and theory of knowledge?! My goodness, is someone trying to impress a philosophy professor or what?! But don't you worry, my curious friend, because I'm here to explain everything you need to know about this fancy-sounding term.

First of all, let's break it down. A priori is a Latin term that means "from the earlier" or "from the cause to the effect". In the context of epistemology, it refers to knowledge that is independent of experience or observation. In other words, it's knowledge that we have before we even start to gather any information from the outside world.

Now, you might be asking yourself: "How the heck is that even possible? How can we have knowledge before we even learn anything?" Great question, my friend! Let me give you an example. Think about mathematical truths, like 2+2=4 or that the angles of a triangle add up to 180 degrees. These are truths that we can know independently of any particular experience or observation. We don't need to count two apples and then two more to know that they make four. We just know it a priori.

But here's the thing: not all knowledge can be acquired a priori. In fact, most of what we know about the world comes from experience and observation. This is a posteriori knowledge, which means knowledge that is based on empirical evidence. For example, we know that the earth is round because we've seen pictures of it from space, or we know that smoking causes cancer because we've seen the statistical evidence.

So, why does this matter? Why do philosophers care about a priori knowledge? Well, it's because a lot of the big questions in philosophy deal with concepts that may or may not be knowable a priori. For instance, is morality objective or subjective? Is the mind a separate substance from the body? Does God exist? These are all questions that philosophers have debated for centuries, and the answers may depend on whether we can know the answers a priori or if we need to rely on empirical evidence.

In summary, a priori knowledge is knowledge that we have independent of experience, observation, or empirical evidence. It's not the most common type of knowledge, but it is important for certain philosophical discussions. And now, my dear friend, you can impress your philosophy professor with your newfound knowledge of a priori! Aren't you glad you asked?