• Law -> International Law and Foreign Relations

• 0 Comment

In the age of digital diplomacy, how do International Sanctions impact social media and online activism surrounding Human Rights violations?

Cecile Kilpatrick

In the age of digital diplomacy, the impact of International Sanctions on social media and online activism surrounding Human Rights violations is complex and multi-faceted.

On one hand, social media and online activism allow for easier communication and organization of global support for Human Rights issues. Activists and individuals can utilize social media platforms to share information, raise awareness and mobilize people around the world to take action against Human Rights violations. However, International Sanctions can impede these activities, often restricting access to social media and online platforms, limiting the ability of activists to share their message and collaborate with others who share their values.

Moreover, International Sanctions can also have a negative effect by empowering repressive regimes. Sanctions can limit a country's access to digital technology and social media and hinder those championing for freedoms and liberties within these countries. Sanctions can also allow governments to block content that they find objectionable, including Human Rights information and activism, thus halting campaigns aimed at promoting Human Rights.

Another issue that arises is the role of corporations in the impact of International Sanctions on social media and online activism surrounding Human Rights. Many large technology companies are based in countries where governments hold significant control over what information is disseminated online. US-based digital companies, such as Google or Facebook, for example, must comply with government requests for access to information. In some cases, these companies may also provide services to sanctioned countries that impede access to social media channels.

Finally, the use of digital diplomacy, or the integration of technology to disseminate and relay information about international affairs, can help to counteract the negative measures that International Sanctions have on social media and online activism surrounding Human Rights. By utilizing digital diplomacy tactics, such as sponsored campaign ads, global webinars and online conferences, and other forms of outreach, governments can engage audiences and promote messages related to human rights and freedom from within oppressive nations, thus empowering human rights activists to continue their vital work.

Ultimately, the impact of International Sanctions on social media and online activism surrounding Human Rights violations depends on a complex interplay of factors, including government control, corporate compliance, and the evolution of digital diplomacy. Finding ways to balance these competing interests is critical to ensuring that the power of digital technology is harnessed in support of Human Rights, rather than being used to undermine them.