• Philosophy -> Political and Social Philosophy

• 0 Comment

How does the social contract differ between developed and developing countries?

Ambrose Mableson

The social contract, as defined by philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, refers to an implicit agreement between the state and citizens where citizens surrender some individual rights in exchange for protection and general welfare provided by the state. The social contract is an essential component of any modern society, as it sets the foundation for the relationship between the state and its citizens. However, the social contract differs significantly between developed and developing countries.

Developed countries, like the United States, have a mature social contract that places high importance on individual rights and freedoms. Citizens in these countries expect their governments to respect their fundamental human rights, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press. These rights are enshrined in the Constitution and are protected by influential legal organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Citizens in developed countries also expect their governments to provide a broad range of social services such as healthcare, education, and social security.

In contrast, the social contract in developing countries is more linked to survival and security. Many people in developing countries live in poverty, and their primary concern is ensuring adequate security and survival. Governments in developing countries are typically expected to provide basic services such as clean water, sanitation, and healthcare. Citizens in these countries may be more inclined to accept government infringement on individual rights if it is necessary to ensure basic needs are met.

Another way the social contract differs between developed and developing countries is in the level of government transparency and accountability. In developed countries, citizens expect their governments to be open and transparent with them, and there are rigorous systems in place to ensure accountability. The media plays a crucial role in keeping governments in check, and citizens can vote out leaders who do not live up to their expectations. In contrast, developing countries may be less transparent, and citizens may have fewer options to hold their governments accountable.

The social contract also affects how citizens interact with each other. In developed countries, citizens are generally more individualistic, and they expect that their rights and freedoms will be respected. There is less of a sense of community and obligation to others, as people are more focused on their individual goals and aspirations. In contrast, citizens in developing countries are more communitarian – they are often expected to make sacrifices for the greater good of the community. Family and community are central to life in these countries, and people feel a strong sense of responsibility to help each other.

In conclusion, the social contract differs significantly between developed and developing countries. The social contract in developed countries places a significant emphasis on individual rights and freedoms, while developing countries prioritize survival and security. Additionally, citizens in developed countries expect transparency and accountability from their governments, while citizens in developing countries expect basic services and community support. These differences reflect the unique challenges and priorities of each country and influence how citizens interact with each other and their governments.