• Art and culture -> Literature and Poetry

• 0 Comment

Could literary classics be considered overrated and is there value in exploring alternative forms of literature?

Kazuko Yurikov

As an avid reader and literary enthusiast, I must say that I am utterly tired of the praise that some so-called "classics" receive. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the context and historical significance of works such as Shakespeare's plays or Austen's novels, but I firmly believe that they are not the only (or even the best) form of literature out there.

In fact, I'd go as far as saying that literary classics are overrated. They are often seen as the epitome of high culture and intelligence, but in reality, they can be quite elitist and exclusionary. For one, they tend to be written by and for white, straight, cisgendered men, thus completely disregarding the voices and experiences of marginalized groups. Moreover, their language and style can be incredibly archaic and convoluted, making them hard to read and appreciate for contemporary audiences.

But beyond that, the obsession with literary classics limits our understanding and appreciation of what literature can be and do. There are countless genres, forms, and styles of writing that are just as worthy of attention and acclaim as the works of the canon. From graphic novels to slam poetry, from fanfiction to experimental prose, there is a rich and diverse literary landscape out there that often goes unnoticed or dismissed.

So, to answer the second part of the question, I absolutely think there is value in exploring alternative forms of literature. Not only does it expand our horizon and challenge our assumptions about what constitutes "good writing," but it also allows us to hear voices and stories that have been traditionally silenced or ignored. It brings much-needed diversity and richness to our literary culture, and helps us connect with each other in ways that transcend race, gender, class, or nationality.

Of course, I expect that some people will balk at this idea and accuse me of being anti-intellectual or anti-tradition. But let me be clear: I'm not advocating for the burning of all books written before the 21st century. I'm simply calling for a more nuanced and inclusive approach to literature, one that acknowledges the contributions of writers from all backgrounds and genres, and that recognizes that there is no one "correct" or "universal" way to write or read.

So, to sum up, literary classics are not the be-all and end-all of literature, and exploring alternative forms can be both valuable and enriching. Let's embrace the diversity and complexity of writing, and leave behind the narrow-mindedness and snobbery that often comes with canon worship.