• Education -> Pedagogy and Educational Psychology

• 0 Comment

What controversies surround the use of standardized tests in educational psychology research?

Marlys Skeech

There are a variety of controversies surrounding the use of standardized tests in academic psychology research. Critics argue that these tests may be biased against certain groups, misunderstand the complexity of understanding, and may have undesirable effects on teaching and learning.

One of the biggest concerns surrounding standardized tests is bias. Critics claim that these exams often favor people from particular classes, races, or cultural backgrounds. Some standardized tests have been criticized because they do not take into account the variety of experiences and learning styles that people from various backgrounds may have. This means that test-takers who come from less privileged backgrounds may have a disadvantage when compared to individuals from more privileged communities. For example, standardized tests that are focused heavily on language or reading comprehension may be more difficult for students who speak English as a second language or those with learning disabilities.

Another controversy surrounding standardized tests is their narrow focus. Critics assert that these exams tend to focus solely on a few subjects and areas of knowledge, such as mathematics, reading, and writing. This fact can lead to student neglecting other aspects of learning that are vital, such as creativity, critical thinking, as well as interpersonal and social skills. When students are solely evaluated on how well they understand a curriculum, it can lead to a lack of emphasis on these important areas.

Moreover, the influence of standardization is another issue with these tests. For some individuals, the emphasis placed on standardized tests can direct a student's understanding of academic gains. Research has indicated that when teachers emphasize doing well on standardized tests, their students will direct their learning to this end. However, this focus could have negative consequences because it leads to teaching that depends on memorization and regurgitation of facts rather than fostering creativity and critical thinking. Therefore, the standardized exams could influence the way teachers teach and evaluate how students learn, leading to a less engaging classroom experience for students.

Furthermore, there are concerns that standardized tests may narrow the focus of educational research. These tests are typically focused on quantifying certain aspects of learning that can be scored easily. Such assessments reduce the complexity of understanding an individual's intelligence, capability, and potential. In addition, this focus can provide very little to make decisions about which teaching methods are the most effective, where there are variations in student populations, or the interaction between teachers and classes. By only relying on highly scaleable testing techniques, there may be limitations to educational research and innovation over time.

In conclusion, there are several controversies surrounding the use of standardized tests in educational psychology research. Critics argue that these tests may be biased against certain groups, may underestimate the complexity of understanding, and may have undesirable effects on teaching and learning. As a result, many educators have questioned their effectiveness in promoting a well-rounded education for students, raising curricular equity, and supporting new insights into the complexities of learning. Rather than trying to rely solely on standardized tests, it is critical that educators take a more nuanced approach to the evaluation of learner capability and potential, considering the interplay of test scores, teacher feedback, and other indicators that reveal educational progress and achievement over time.