• Law -> Civil and Commercial Law

• 0 Comment

How do different types of arbitration compare in terms of international disputes?

Clemmie Oakhill

International disputes are a complex issue that requires a fair and impartial resolution. The use of arbitration as a form of dispute resolution has been increasingly popular in recent years. However, there are different types of arbitration available, and each one has a distinct set of benefits and drawbacks.

Firstly, ad hoc arbitration is a method in which the arbitration proceedings are not determined by a particular institution. This type of arbitration allows the parties involved to have complete control over the process and the arbitrator selection. Ad hoc arbitration can also be more flexible and cost-effective since there are fewer fees associated with institutional support. However, this type of arbitration can be more difficult to manage, and there is no standard set of rules to follow, which may lead to uncertainty regarding the process's fairness.

Secondly, institutional arbitration involves utilizing the services of an institution, such as the International Chamber of Commerce or the London Court of International Arbitration. The institution's involvement provides impartiality and ensures a high degree of professionalism. The rules that govern the process are well-defined, providing predictability, certainty, and structure. However, institutional arbitration can be more expensive due to the fees and costs involved.

Finally, investment arbitration is a specialized form of arbitration that is used to settle investment disputes between foreign investors and host states. It is mainly governed by bilateral and multilateral treaties. Investment arbitration is considered a contentious and sensitive area due to the high stakes involved. The use of investment arbitration can be beneficial since it protects foreign investors from political and legal risks. However, the process can be lengthy and costly, and there is a risk of a lack of transparency.

Overall, each type of arbitration has unique benefits and drawbacks regarding international disputes. Ad hoc arbitration can be more flexible and less expensive, while institutional arbitration provides impartiality and structure. Investment arbitration is a specialized area that protects foreign investors but can be expensive and lengthy. The key is to choose a method that is appropriate to the specific dispute's needs and characteristics. Therefore, having an understanding of each type of arbitration and seeking the advice of legal professionals is essential when choosing a method to resolve international disputes.