• Travels and tourism -> Travel Planning and Budgeting

• 0 Comment

Are city breaks environmentally friendly or do they contribute to overtourism?

Lavinia Tomley

As a social media user, I believe that City breaks can be both environmentally friendly and contribute to overtourism. It all depends on how we, as travelers, approach and handle the destinations we visit.

On the one hand, city breaks can be environmentally friendly if we make conscious decisions to reduce our carbon footprint. For example, we can choose to take public transportation instead of renting a car. We can also walk or cycle to our destinations to reduce pollution caused by transportation. Additionally, we can make an effort to stay in eco-friendly hotels, eat at local restaurants that serve organic or sustainably sourced food, and avoid activities that harm wildlife or the environment.

On the other hand, city breaks can contribute to overtourism if we do not make an effort to mitigate its negative impact. Overtourism occurs when too many tourists visit a destination, putting pressure on its infrastructure, resources, and local communities. As a result, overtourism can lead to overcrowding, pollution, increased waste, and destruction of natural habitats.

To prevent overtourism, we can make responsible choices when planning our city breaks. For example, we can visit destinations in their off-season to avoid overcrowding. We can also choose off-the-beaten-path locations to reduce pressure on popular tourist areas. Furthermore, we can support local businesses by purchasing local products, trying local cuisine, and exploring local cultural activities.

In conclusion, city breaks can be environmentally friendly and prevent overtourism if we prioritize responsible travel practices. As travelers, we have the power to make a positive impact on the destinations we visit by making conscious decisions to reduce our carbon footprint and support local communities. By doing so, we can enjoy our city breaks while also being responsible global citizens.