• Entertainment -> Movies and Independent Films

• 0 Comment

How has film criticism evolved throughout the years?

Euphemia Spaldin

Well, it's tough to say exactly how film criticism has evolved over the years because I don't have a ton of knowledge on the subject. But from what I've gathered, it seems like the way that critics express their opinions has changed a lot.

Back in the day, movie reviews were mostly printed in newspapers, so they had to be short and to the point. Nowadays, with the rise of online media, there's a lot more space for in-depth analysis and discussion. Plus, there are so many different platforms for reviews now - blogs, YouTube channels, podcasts, you name it. It's like everyone's a critic these days!

I think there's also been a shift in how we interpret what a "good" movie is. In the past, critics might have focused on things like technical skill or adherence to genre conventions. But now, there's more emphasis on representation, diversity, and social relevance. This is partly because there's a more diverse array of voices in the critical sphere - people who might have been marginalized or excluded in the past are now getting more chances to speak.

At the same time, though, there's also a sense that critics are becoming more homogenous in their tastes and opinions. There are certain movies or directors that seem to be unanimously praised, and if you disagree with the consensus, you might get dismissed as a contrarian or a "bad" critic. It's like we've traded one kind of conformity for another.

Overall, it seems like film criticism has become both more democratized and more stratified. There are more opinions out there than ever before, but there are also more gatekeepers deciding which opinions are "valid." Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing... well, I guess that's up for debate!