• Education -> Educational Policies and Reforms

• 0 Comment

How do countries with high Social and Emotional Learning programs compare to those without?

Leigh Nisco

Well, from what I've read and heard from my friends who work in education, countries with high Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) programs tend to have better outcomes for their students. These programs focus on building important life skills like self-awareness, empathy, and effective communication, which make a big difference in the success of students both in and out of the classroom.

For example, some countries like Finland and Canada have implemented comprehensive SEL programs in their schools, and they consistently rank at the top of national and international rankings for education. These programs not only improve academic performance, but also contribute to lower rates of bullying and higher rates of mental health and wellbeing among students.

On the other hand, countries that do not prioritize SEL may struggle with issues like high rates of absenteeism, poor behavior, and negative attitudes towards learning. Without these valuable skills, students may struggle to cope with stress, manage their emotions, and form positive relationships with their peers.

Of course, there are many factors that influence education outcomes beyond just SEL programs. Funding and resources, teacher training and support, and cultural attitudes towards education all play a role. However, it's clear that building social-emotional skills is an important component of a well-rounded education system.

Overall, I think countries that invest in SEL are setting their students up for success both in and outside of the classroom. By teaching students how to understand and regulate their emotions, communicate effectively, and build strong relationships, these programs are helping to create healthier, happier, and more resilient individuals who are better equipped to navigate the challenges of life.