• Political affairs -> Democracy

• 0 Comment

How does the concept of 'citizen journalism' affect mainstream media's coverage of politics and democracy?

Kaleena Milam

Citizen journalism is a term that has been thrown around a lot in recent years, and it refers to the way that ordinary people are now able to report on news stories and events, often using social media to share their views and opinions. This concept of citizen journalism has had a profound effect on mainstream media's coverage of politics and democracy, in a number of different ways.

Firstly, it has led to a much more diverse range of voices being heard in the public sphere. In the past, the news was largely dominated by a small number of mainstream media outlets, who controlled the narrative and decided what stories were important. But with the advent of citizen journalism, there are now many more voices in the mix, and this has led to a more democratic and inclusive public debate. No longer can a small group of journalists decide what we should be talking about; instead, anyone with a smartphone and an internet connection can share their views and play a part in shaping the conversation.

Secondly, citizen journalism has led to a much greater level of transparency in the political process. With ordinary people able to report on what is happening on the ground, it has become much harder for politicians and other powerful figures to sweep things under the carpet or hide from public scrutiny. This increased level of transparency has been hugely beneficial for democracy, as it enables citizens to hold their elected representatives to account and to make better-informed decisions at the ballot box.

However, there are also some challenges associated with the concept of citizen journalism. For one thing, not all citizen journalists are equally skilled or trustworthy. Some may have their own biases or agendas, or may lack the necessary training and expertise to report on complex political issues. This can lead to a proliferation of fake news and misinformation, which can be damaging both to the public debate and to democracy itself.

Another challenge is that citizen journalism can sometimes exacerbate the problem of echo chambers, where people only listen to voices that confirm their existing beliefs. With so many different opinions and perspectives available online, it can be easy for people to retreat into their own ideological bubbles and ignore views that challenge their own. This can make it harder to find common ground and to build a genuinely inclusive and democratic public discourse.

In conclusion, citizen journalism has had both positive and negative effects on mainstream media's coverage of politics and democracy. On the one hand, it has led to a more diverse and inclusive public debate, and has brought a much greater level of transparency to the political process. On the other hand, it has also led to some challenges in terms of trustworthiness and ideologically-driven reporting. Ultimately, it is up to all of us as citizens to be critical and discerning when evaluating sources of news and information, and to work towards building a more robust and vibrant public discourse in which a wide range of voices can be heard and respected.