• Food and Gastronomy -> Food and environment

• 0 Comment

How does organic farming compare to conventional farming in terms of environmental impact?

Stevie MacCroary

Organic farming and conventional farming are two different ways to grow food. Organic farming uses natural resources, like compost and manure, to fertilize the soil and control pests. Conventional farming uses synthetic fertilizers and pesticides to grow crops.

When we talk about environmental impact, we mean how farming affects the environment. Organic farming is better for the environment because it uses natural resources instead of chemicals that can pollute the soil, air, and water. Organic farmers also focus on preserving biodiversity (a variety of different plants and animals) by not using genetically modified seeds.

Conventional farming can have a negative impact on the environment because it uses synthetic fertilizers and pesticides that can contaminate nearby water sources and harm animals.

One of the biggest differences between organic and conventional farming is their approach to soil health. Organic farmers focus on building healthy soil through practices like crop rotation and cover-cropping. This helps the soil retain moisture, which reduces the need for irrigation and conserves water. Healthy soil also absorbs carbon dioxide (a greenhouse gas) from the atmosphere, which helps mitigate climate change.

Conventional farming, on the other hand, can lead to erosion and soil degradation because the soil isn't given time to rest and recuperate between crops. This can cause the soil to lose important nutrients and become less fertile over time.

In conclusion, organic farming is better for the environment because it uses natural resources and practices that promote soil health and biodiversity. Conventional farming can have negative impacts on the environment because it relies on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides that can harm wildlife and water sources, as well as cause soil degradation over time.