• Philosophy -> Political and Social Philosophy

• 0 Comment

Is utilitarianism a practical and realistic approach to solving complex political and social issues?

Carin Newbegin

Utilitarianism is a philosophical approach that seeks to maximize the well-being of all individuals in society. In theory, it sounds like a great way to solve complex political and social issues by placing the greater good above individual desires. However, when it comes to practicality and realism, utilitarianism falls short.

One of the biggest problems with utilitarianism is determining what constitutes the greater good. Who decides? Is it the government or the majority? What about those who may be negatively affected by the decision? Utilitarianism does not account for individual rights and freedoms, which are essential in any society.

Furthermore, utilitarianism assumes that everyone has equal value and that their well-being can be quantified. In reality, this is not the case. Different individuals have different needs, desires, and priorities. Trying to quantify their well-being can be subjective and arbitrary. Additionally, utilitarianism does not account for the impact on future generations. It focuses solely on the well-being of the present generations, which can lead to unsustainable solutions.

Utilitarianism also has ethical issues. It can justify immoral actions as long as they maximize overall well-being. For example, sacrificing a minority group for the greater good of the majority is a violation of human rights and dignity. Utilitarianism also neglects the importance of justice, fairness, and equality. These values are necessary for a just and equitable society.

In conclusion, while utilitarianism may seem like an appealing approach to solving complex political and social issues, it is not practical or realistic. It neglects individual rights and freedoms, fails to account for the impact on future generations, assumes everyone has equal value, and has ethical issues. Utilitarianism is not a useful tool for solving complex issues. Instead, a balance between individual rights and the common good, with an emphasis on justice and equality, is necessary for a just and equitable society.