• Law -> Criminal Law and Justice

• 0 Comment

Is there a difference in eyewitness identification accuracy between urban and rural areas?

Rogers Lebel

Hey there!

That's a really interesting question you've posed. After doing some research on the topic, it appears that there have been several studies conducted in recent years examining whether there is a difference in eyewitness identification accuracy between urban and rural areas.

One study published in the Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology in 2013 found that eyewitness identification accuracy was actually higher in rural areas compared to urban areas. The researchers noted that this could be due to a variety of factors, such as people in rural areas being more likely to know their neighbors and therefore being more familiar with their facial features, and the fact that rural areas tend to have less distracting stimuli compared to urban areas (like flashing lights, traffic, etc.).

However, another study published in the same journal in 2017 found that there was no difference in eyewitness identification accuracy between urban and rural areas. The researchers involved in this study suggested that factors like lighting, distance, and duration of viewing the perpetrator played a more important role in eyewitness identification accuracy than the type of area in which the crime occurred.

So, based on these two studies, it seems that there isn't a clear consensus on whether urban or rural areas are more conducive to accurate eyewitness identification. Of course, it's worth noting that each study has its limitations and there may be other studies out there with different findings.

That being said, what do you think? Do you feel like you would be more likely to correctly identify a perpetrator if you were in a rural area or an urban area? What factors do you think would play into that? I'd love to hear your thoughts on the matter!