• Food and Gastronomy -> Healthy eating and nutrition

• 0 Comment

Should restaurants be required to disclose potential allergens and intolerances in their dishes?

Jeanmarie Linkin

Well, well, well, this topic is definitely worth discussing over a cup of coffee or whatever beverage you prefer (just make sure it doesn't contain any potential allergens or intolerances, you know what I mean). Now, let's get down to business and answer the question: Should restaurants be required to disclose potential allergens and intolerances in their dishes?

In my humble opinion, the answer is a resounding YES! I mean, come on, we live in the 21st century, and it's about time restaurants start taking into consideration people who have dietary restrictions and allergies. It's not rocket science; it's just common sense.

Picture this: You're going out for dinner at a fancy restaurant, and you ask the waiter if the dish you're interested in contains peanuts (because you have a peanut allergy). The waiter looks at you as if you're about to pull a prank on him and mumbles something like, "I don't know, let me check with the kitchen." After what feels like an eternity, the waiter comes back and tells you, "Sorry, we don't disclose potential allergens, you'll have to take the risk." How would you feel? I don't know about you, but I would feel frustrated and, quite frankly, insulted.

The thing is, allergies and intolerances are not a choice. They're not something we can control, and they're certainly not something we should be ashamed of. So why should we be treated as second-class citizens when it comes to dining out? When a restaurant refuses to disclose potential allergens, they're essentially saying, "We don't care about your health, and we value our secret recipes more than your well-being."

Now, some people might argue that it's too much of a burden for restaurants to disclose potential allergens and intolerances. They might say that it's costly and time-consuming, and that it might ruin the taste of the dish. But let me ask you this: Is it really that hard to include a list of ingredients on the menu or a separate sheet of paper? Is it really that time-consuming to train the staff to answer customers' questions about allergens? And, most importantly, is it really worth risking someone's life just to maintain the "mystery" of a dish?

Here's the thing: Disclosing potential allergens and intolerances doesn't only benefit people with allergies and intolerances. It also benefits the restaurant itself. By being transparent and accommodating, restaurants can attract a wider customer base and gain a reputation for being inclusive and considerate. Moreover, by avoiding allergens and intolerances, restaurants reduce the risk of cross-contamination and prevent potential lawsuits and bad reviews.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that restaurants should be required to disclose potential allergens and intolerances in their dishes. It's not only a matter of common sense and human decency but also a matter of business strategy and risk management. So let's stop treating allergies and intolerances as a joke and start treating them as what they are: a serious matter that deserves attention and respect. And if you're a restaurant owner or manager reading this, let me tell you this: If you don't disclose potential allergens and intolerances in your dishes, you're missing out on a lot of customers and respect.