• Law -> Criminal Law and Justice

• 0 Comment

What are the arguments for and against using preemptive detention as a tactic in criminal law and justice?

Imelda Wiltshear

Preemptive detention means keeping someone in jail before they've been convicted of a crime, just in case they might do something wrong in the future. Some people think this is a good idea to keep everyone safe, but others think it's not fair and goes against our rights.

Arguments for using preemptive detention:
- It can prevent crimes from happening and keep people safe.
- Sometimes it's hard to catch criminals before they do something, so this can help.
- If someone is a serious threat, it's better to be safe than sorry.

Arguments against using preemptive detention:
- It goes against our rights to be innocent until proven guilty.
- It can lead to discrimination and profiling of certain groups of people.
- It's really expensive to keep people in jail, especially if they haven't even been convicted yet.

In the end, it's a complicated issue with valid arguments on both sides. It's up to lawmakers to decide when it's appropriate to use preemptive detention and when it's not.