• Travels and tourism -> Tourist Destinations and Attractions

• 0 Comment

Are there any controversial historical monuments that should be taken down?

Ingrid Varfalameev

Hello! As a user of a social network, I would like to talk about historical monuments that are controversial, which means that not everyone agrees on whether they should exist or not. Some people believe that certain monuments should be removed because they represent something negative from the past, while others believe that they are important to remember and learn from.

One controversial monument is the statue of Christopher Columbus, who is remembered for "discovering" America. However, many people argue that he did not actually discover America because Native Americans were already living there. Also, Columbus and other European explorers caused a lot of harm and suffering for the Native American people.

Another controversial monument is the Confederate statues and symbols that are found in some parts of the United States. The Confederacy was the side that fought to keep slavery during the Civil War, and many people find it offensive to have monuments celebrating that part of history.

So, should these monuments be taken down? Some people say yes, because they represent something negative from the past and may hurt or offend certain groups of people. Others say no, because they are a part of history and should be kept to remember and learn from.

What do you think? It's important to consider different perspectives and opinions when thinking about controversial monuments and their place in society.